MINUTES
TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING
Voting Members Present: Ron Eck,
Chris Gluck, Graham Kenneweg, Mary Ann Liberatore, Ken Martis, Roy Nutter, Don
Spencer, Paul Steel, Buffy Vehse
Non-Voting Members
Present:
Members Absent: Sharon Semans
ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Nomination of Ron Eck as
Chairman of the Traffic Commission.
Motion by Roy Nutter and
second by Ken Martis to appoint Ron Eck as Chairman of the Traffic
Commission. Motion passed unanimously.
Nomination of Roy Nutter as
Vice Chairman of the Traffic Commission.
Motion by Ken Martis and
second by Mary Ann Liberatore to close the nominations for Vice Chairman. Motion passed unanimously.
Motion by Graham Kenneweg
and second by Don Spencer to appoint Roy Nutter as Vice Chairman of the Traffic
Commission. Motion passed unanimously.
MATTER OF BUSINESS:
Minutes from the June, 2004
meeting were approved as distributed.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Status Report on
Don Spencer inquired as to
what constitutes a speeding problem.
Terry stated that it was 5
miles over the speed limit or 30 miles per hour.
Mr. Spencer stated that he
received 10 e-mails saying contrary to what the study concludes. He also stated that he feels the counters
were not accurate and requested that the speed display unit be placed on
Riverview.
Terry stated that she can
only go by data received on the counters from
Mary Ann Liberatore asked
Mr. Spencer if there was a specific time frame in which the speeding was
occurring.
Mr. Spencer stated that no
specific time frame was given to him.
Mary Ann Liberatore stated
that we should get more specific information such as license numbers of the
speeding vehicles and the time frame in which the speeding occurs.
Mr. Spencer stated he would
ask the concerned citizens for this information.
Ron Eck asked Jeff Thorne
if the Traffic Display Unit recorded the speeds.
Mr. Thorne stated it did
not.
Mr. Spencer stated that in
August of last year, the residents on Riverview was
divided about the installation of traffic calming devices. He said that the citizens on the end near the
WVU Presidents house wanted the devices, and those closer to
Ron Eck wanted to clarify
that what the study indicates is that 85% of the drivers were driving at or
below the same speed, not necessarily at the speed limit, and that 15% were
going faster than the norm.
Don Spencer inquired as to
where the counters were placed on
Ron stated that he wasn’t
certain but, he thought it was between
Request from Stephen Tanner for Traffic Mirror at
Intersection of
Graham Kenneweg stated that
he had a residence on Ridgeway and was very familiar with the area and that it
was very dangerous.
Mary Ann Liberatore
questioned the possibility of a stop sign.
She was informed that it would not be feasible.
Buffy Vehse stated that she
goes from Charles onto Johnson quite frequently and vision is definitely a
problem.
Mary Ann Liberatore asked
how we would proceed to change Johnson to one-way from Charles to Louise.
Ron Eck stated that we
would need to have a public hearing on the matter.
Paul Steel said that he
felt changing it to one-way would be better than eliminating the parking.
Graham Kenneweg said that
the condition only worsens in the winter.
Roy Nutter wanted to know
if sight clearing would be enough to put up the stop sign. Terry said that she does not recommend stop
signs on
Motion by Mary Ann
Liberatore and second by Roy Nutter to hold a public hearing on changing
Johnson Avenue to one-way from Charles Avenue to Louise Avenue, and to notify
the residents of the area prior to the next meeting. Motion passed unanimously.
Roy Nutter wanted to know
if changing Johnson to one-way would increase parking on Johnson.
Buffy Vehse asked how we
would advertise the special meeting.
Terry informed her that we
would advertise on our web site, and that it was not necessary to
advertise. However, if the Traffic
Commission agrees to change Johnson to one-way Council would have to do it by
ordinance. The Council would have to
advertise the public hearing in the newspaper.
Intermodal Facility:
Ron Eck stated that during the last meeting the Traffic Commission had a
presentation from Buchart Horn in reference to the proposed intermodal facility
for the
At this time Mr. Eck opened
the floor to Bryan Funkhouser of Buchart Horn, and County Commissioner Asel
Kennedy to answer any questions.
Mr. Funkhouser reiterated
to the Traffic Commission that this was a preliminary study and all they were
trying to do was to locate any fatal flaws.
Ken Martis stated that he
went past the area the other night and noticed the Salvation Army building down
below. He wanted to know if it was going
to be removed.
Mr. Funkhouser stated yes
they were going to have the whole block.
Ron Eck inquired as to who
would be using the facility?
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
since this was just a preliminary study, they had not gotten into the usage
issue as of yet.
Asel Kennedy addressed the
Commission and stated that the
Don Spencer wanted to know
about the turning radius for the buses exiting onto
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
the turning radius could be altered. He
further stated that the reason the buses must stay is that one requirement for
the funding of this project is that twenty percent (20%) of the usage must be
by County employees, and sixty percent (60%) must be from some other mode of
transportation.
Asel Kennedy stated that it
in not actually in the drawings at present.
Roy Nutter asked about the
buses going south on
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
they would go onto Walnut and left at the light. He further stated that this is already the
flow pattern.
Paul Steel inquired at to
why
Asel Kennedy said to call
this an intermodal facility the usage must be for more than just a parking
garage it must tie in to some other transit system.
Don Spencer stated that he
was aware of the Historical Commissions issues with the aforementioned project.
Mr. Kennedy stated that the
Don Spencer wanted to know
if the buses would be parking in the area.
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
no buses would be parked at anytime.
Mr. Spencer asked about the
impact at the light, the first problem he feels would be when the light is
adjusted to adapt for the facility, will it be synchronized to meet the traffic
flow and what will it do to the entire system of lights in the downtown area.
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
their traffic study was based on traffic flow after the synchronization of the
lights.
Mr. Funkhouser said it
would show stacking, and that it did start with traffic stacking.
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
it was indeed addressed.
Mr. Kennedy stated that the
State DOT had responded to the data provided.
Ron Eck asked what the
Mr. Kennedy said that
approval of Court Street to two-way before the
Mr. Funkhouser reminded the
Traffic Commission that this was a preliminary study and that it was conceptual
only. He stated that everything had to
be back to the FTA by the middle of September.
Mary Ann Liberatore asked
if we could list contingencies.
Mr. Kennedy said that the
Traffic Commission needed to look at everything, and not list
contingencies. He said the
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
the documentation with the questions for Buchart-Horn could be emailed to him
for his answers. Mr. Funkhouser stated
that based on the traffic study any mitigation costs would fall under the plan.
Mr. Kennedy asked if the
City Council had to approve this.
Don Spencer asked that
Buchart-Horn address the issues in writing.
He also inquired about what the Parking Authority felt of this
plan. And would there be a problem with
filling the parking garage.
Motion by Don Spencer to
hold a Special Meeting to respond to the
Roy Nutter stated that
there were actually 5 street issues to be addressed:
Mr. Funkhouser stated that
the off set intersections were addressed.
Mr. Nutter inquired about
the reversing of Chancery Row and
Mr. Funkhouser stated this
was needed because no one would be exiting the garage on
Asel Kennedy stated that
Chancery Row would have to be reversed to be able to access High Street.
Bryan Funkhouser asked if
the Traffic Commission’s questions from this evening could be added to the list
to be addressed in writing from Buchart-Horn.
And if the Traffic Commission could hold a special meeting to address
these issues.
Mr. Funkhouser further
stated that he could e-mail the answers to the questions and get the
information out to the Commission members and meet in two weeks to get a
recommendation.
Mr. Funkhouser said that he
felt a Sub-Committee would be better than a Special Meeting.
Asel Kennedy asked if the
traffic changes had to go past Council.
Traffic Study –
Ms. Hough asked the State
when they would be implementing the changes in the report, and they said it
would be when funding would allow.
Roy Nutter stated that
raising the speed limit to 35 MPH on
Don Spencer stated that he
was disappointed with the report in as much as there was no mention of the school
in the area or the fact there were no sidewalks in the area. He was also disappointed that there was no
mention of widening the road.
Mr. Spencer stated that
raising the speed limit does not respect the speeding problem and that he does
not feel it is a positive way of addressing the speeding issue. He further stated that he does not feel the
citizens of the area will accept the outcome.
Jeff Thorne indicated that
the accidents that have occurred on
Paul Steel said that he
does not see the reasoning for raising the speed limit.
Buffy Vehse asked how can
the State justify raising the speed limit from 25 MPH to 35 MPH.
Roy Nutter stated he did
not understand why this was going to be implemented, and inquired as to whether
a By-Pass may be coming in the future.
Paul Steel said he felt
most of the people speeding in the area were workers not families that live
there.
Don Spencer requested that
the Traffic Commission refer this to the Suncrest Neighborhood Association or
the MPO for their comments.
Roy Nutter stated that the
only problem he had with the report was the raising of the speed limit
everything else seemed okay.
Mr. Harold Moore,
Mr. Moore said he felt one
alternative would be stop signs at 3 locations and he feels stop signs do
alleviate speeding. He thought another
alternative would be speed humps or speed bumps. He said that
Mr. Moore stated that from
Mr. Moore said that if
Mr. Moore said that stop
signs in residential areas should work, but if they do not there has to be
something that does work.
Arlyn Perkey of
Don Spencer said he felt
that this deserved more attention.
Don Spencer inquired as to
whether the study could be done by the October Traffic Commission Meting.
Ken Martis asked Jeff
Thorne if the police department could do extra patrols at the minimum, but
possibly place the speed display unit.
Jeff Thorne said he would
see that it was done.
Mr. Martis asked Lt. Thorne
to make sure it was done so as not to skew the study.
Ron Eck said that he would
have the study done as soon as possible.
Roy Nutter stated that he
agrees that the cut through traffic has increased.
Buffy Vehse inquired as to
considering changing to one way street.
Graham Kenneweg stated that
he felt speed humps were a good idea.
Don Spencer said there was
a dip in the road and asked that the City Street Department not repair it, as
is serves as a speed deterrent.
Mr. Moore told Lt. Thorne
that there was really no way for an officer to get his car out of the line of
sight. He also feels that a traffic
study will not help.
Roy Nutter inquired as to
whether
Mr. Nutter inquired about
the Willowdale Project.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Franklin-White stated
that the Police Department was backing him on this issue. He stated that
Buffy Vehse asked whether
there were any signs there before.
Ken Martis said that he
noticed that in
Roy Nutter asked if the
West Side of Hudson Street could be No Parking Here to Corner. He further stated that he feels this does
warrant a sign.
Motion by Roy Nutter to
install a “No Parking Here to Corner” sign on
Don Spencer stated that a
4-way stop sign is needed. He stated he
lives on the dead end side of Harvard.
He said people speed as they approach the school. He feels the change is necessary because of
the amount of traffic flow through
Paul Steel asked if we
could slow down traffic in a school zone.
Mr. Spencer stated there
are no stop signs on
Roy Nutter said that he
understood from a previous meeting, that the principal was against stop signs.
Ron Eck said that he has
watched traffic blow through the 3-way stop near the school. He feels the 3-way stop can give children a
false hope that people will stop.
Don Spencer said the
speeding on
Ron Eck stated that
Suncrest has a bigger traffic issue than this.
Mary Ann Liberatore
suggested that the Traffic Commission look at the entire area, and bring it all
into on general issue.
Don Spencer said he
realized Mrs. Friend’s concern because that is a central location in the
neighborhood and kids are always playing there.
He feels the Traffic Commission should do the best job and keep
consistent. He said it is a bottleneck
hub for cut through traffic.
Ron Eck asked if Fenwick
was a cut through.
Mr. Spencer stated that
drivers go down Fenwick to
Roy Nutter made a motion to
table this matter for further investigation.
Seconded by Ken Martis. Motion
carried.
Don Spencer stated that he
walked
Paul Steel said he felt
Mary Ann Liberatore said
she feels a 4 way stop is warranted at the intersection of
Roy Nutter said he did not
see the fire hydrant.
Motion by Don Spencer that
a 4-way stop be created at the intersection of
Motion by Mary Ann
Liberatore to deny the request for a 3-way stop at the intersection of
Don Spencer asked for a way
to control speed and improve safety at the intersection of
Roy Nutter stated that from
Paul Steel stated that
while he was in the vicinity, there were not a lot of people coming from
Chairman Eck asked for a
vote on the motion to deny the 3-way stop sign at the intersection of

Use of Cameras: Request of Commissioner Spencer pertaining to
the use of cameras for Speeding and Stop Lights.
Mr. Spencer read from a
Traffic Calming guide from August of 1999 stating that photo radar measures
speed and photos of passing speeders. He
read they can be portable, and if we staffed one unit full time it would cost
$4,000 per month for lease, and $3,000 per month if purchased. Mr. Spencer inquired about the legal issues
and if the price has dropped and if leasing in option. Mr. Spencer wanted to know about the
possibility of utilizing this mode of traffic calming.
Ron Eck asked if this was
legal.
Jeff Thorne stated that to
staff the unit at all times would require one officer and it would have to be
calibrated and the officer would have to travel with the unit. He said that radar units are less expensive
in the long run, because of the need for an additional officer to operate
solely that unit.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Buffy Vehse asked if the
Traffic Commission could recommend the addition of another officer for the
Police Department.
Chris Gluck stated that we
need to do a survey to determine what we need, to deter speeding and running of
stop lights. He also inquired as to whether
or not the photo radar could be misconstrued as a speed trap.
Ron Eck stated that he has
heard that in some instances the photo radar units have been charged with
invasion of privacy.
Roy Nutter requested that
Chief Scott and City Manager Boroff be asked to attend the next Traffic
Commission meeting to respond to the Commissioners inquiries.
Buffy Vehse stated that the
sidewalk on
Ron Eck stated that he
would be obliged to do a presentation on traffic calming at the November
Traffic Commission meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
ADJOURNMENT